Blog

  • Secret Tantric Instruction

    TANTRA ORIGINS: HINDUISM

    According to encyclopaedia Brittanica: tantra is ‘any of numerous texts dealing with the esoteric practices’ of—at least one—Hindu, sect.  We redefine ‘new-age’, ‘Neo’ and by definition, the even-less-accessible, more-indigenous and secret tantric ‘classical’ practices for those curious about tantra. 

    Part 1

    ABSTRACT

    ‘The earliest known use of the noun’ tantrism ‘is in the 1870s’ of the common era, CE.  More specifically: the Oxford English dictionary’s—OED’s—‘earliest evidence for Tantrism is from 1877’ CE, ‘in the writing of M. Williams.’

    That is:

    25, 541.5 years TRAPCAT Polaris

    According to our website’s previously introduced system of dating, linked to here.  

    The Indian subcontinent was explored and conquered by the British empire.  So whatever tantric practices were therein permit, we define here as neo-tantra.

    New age tantra may be even more removed from its roots.  This developed in a culture whose contemporary cultural aspirations vastly differ from those of neo-tantra and classical tantrism, before that.  

    INTRODUCTION

    The present article sets the stage, charting the timeline leading towards the birth of tantrism—a ‘spiritual’ practice nested within Hinduism.  It is part of a short series of articles intended to relate and comment upon our source—eventually linked to here.

    The article series not only is intended to give an internal overview on tantrism.  It is also aimed to provide some historical and philosophical context to the claims made of tantrism.  

    CONTEXT & BACKGROUND

    The present article was sourced from a lecture series introducing Hinduism, one of the

    world’s great religions.  In its totality, the lectures investigate a variety of dimensions that are important in answering the aforementioned faith’s fundamental questions.

    This would be of interest to comparative religions’ serious students.  For the reader of this article, we have picked out parts alluding to secret tantric teachings—the juiciest bits—so to speak.

    We have paraphrased the course’s material pertaining directly to tantra, and use this article as a potential springboard for deeper-diving.   

    The source—revealed at series’-end—progresses chronologically through Hinduism’s history, from its earliest known precursors.  The source then navigates through Hinduism’s manifestations in a classical era.

    Finally, it shapes its course through the belief-system’s responses to the world contemporary with the ‘penning’ of the present article.

    On this conceptual journey, aspects salient to Hindu life are discussed and contextualised historically, as well as theologically.  It is important to understand these criteria when exploring any aspect of Hinduism—including any lost, hidden or secret tantric doctrine.

    For such an understanding, a number of important things are outlined in the sentences below.

    It permits exploration into aspects of modern-tantra, authentic to the place and period of its origin.

    It also allows us to acknowledge the tradition, whilst releasing any unsavoury aspects of it that may be authentically distanced.

    Ancient philosophical systems make certain cosmic assumptions that we are better informed about today.  The tradition may work for the reader, but not necessarily due to the mechanisms claimed by former ways of thought.

    The source opens by explaining some problematical matters involved in academically studying Hinduism.  It observes some of the associated difficulties pertaining to fundamental terms of the course, particularly religion, Hinduism concepts, and India.

    ~As a bit of a spoiler, tantra is a medieval outcropping of Hindu culture.  However, who can be comfortable discussing tantrism without examining either side of it on the Hinduism timeline?

    Surely, in our deterministic universe, Hindu prehistory and ancient history, as well as contemporary tantra are connected by—the intermediate—medieval tantrism.

    There are five-thousand years of Indo-Aryan history to examine the early cultures of … That most significantly shaped the development of Hinduism.  

    The source briefly visits the indigenous culture of northern India—the Indus Valley civilization—prior to introducing Āryans’ migration from Central Asia.  It was in fact the

    Āryans who bequeathed Hinduism with its most sacred and authoritative of scriptures—the Veda.

    The source explored the zeitgeist the Veda emerged from; it turns out that many English words are etymologically rooted therein.  

    The English word ‘ignite’ is related to the Vedic fire-god, Agni, so see what you make of this link …. 

    As an aside, Agni’s colour, familiar beast, and associated body part are all reminiscent of Western contemporary astrological-classical fire-sign-Aries-Ares, god-of-war.

    For any secret tantric techniques and teachings, we return to our source, from which we hope to glean tantalising evidence.  The discussion moved from the Vedic period to the era of classical Hinduism.  In the classical period, the belief system generated much of its basic practices and ideology … This will be a recurring observation of ours that the former often precedes the later.

    Notions of ‘transmigration of the soul’ and ‘karma’ are thereby included.  As a website very much interested in philosophy, terminology and the assumptions that underpinned terminology are intended for questioning.

    Semantics are significant in our web site

    The present article merely introduces the source as it pertains to our quest for secret tantric insight and practical knowledge.  However, it is our intent to later give type to our thoughts on the aforementioned quoted phrases.

    Returning to the source: it discusses major societal arrangements that were established within Hindu culture in its classical era’s duration.  Such are the caste system, as well as life-patterns variation for:

    Women, and 

    Men.

    As our previous publication would have it, the following sentence’s terms are used in place of:

    Woman, and

    Man, respectively.

    Sapient sapient adult, SSA, and 

    Sapient sapient in utero sex-changed adult—SSIUSCA—or in utero sex-changed sapient sapient adult, IUSCSSA, respectively.

    No: it is not an internal-joke, but the result of a philosophical contemplation, again pertaining to terminology and logical consistency.

    Both gender patterns and the aforementioned caste-system social stratifications greatly affect the nature of all Hindu’s ‘spiritual’ life, or psyche.

    Yes, that is correct, the reader’s patience can now start to pay off!

    For readers wondering what all of this has to do with secret tantric sectarianism, they may now be getting a better idea.

    We not only import the fruits of Asian culture but also its stem, thorns, soil, and accompanying weeds.  Western yoga lovers may perhaps consider gender and caste-system to be embarrassing parasitic elements, the aforementioned weeds, as it were.

    One may ask the following question, however.

    Who are we to deem tantra and yoga as being fruit, and the caste-system and gender-divide as being societal evils?

    To answer correctly, the response is not as simple as saying: 

    ‘Because modern western-European cultural-values preclude this sort of thing’.

    The egalitarian west is undergoing a radical transformation into a different sort of society.  This may preclude it from ever again being able to impose its will so forcefully on a now—nuclear armed—east.

    What the historian can say—unshackled from political correctness—is that Britain was once a place whose society sufficiently-developed over several generations.  The nature of the aforementioned ‘sufficiency’ was British society’s ability to do what is described in the next sentence.

    That is for one nation to—scientifically, technologically, and thus militarily, politically, and ultimately culturally—impose its will upon another nation.

    Even if we are sampling curry, we are often sampling it from a spoon.

    We can deem tantra and yoga as being fruit.

    We can also deem the caste-system and gender-divide as being societal-evils—to answer the previous question—inasmuch as pre-colonial British mores permit.

    This argument bears deep consideration, and we invite your comments below.  Our internal debate can determine what we take from medieval tantra, what we leave behind, and why.

    To clarify the thought, The United Kingdom of Great Britain colonised and absorbed the Indian subcontinent into her own empire.  Perhaps then, whatever capacity pre-colonial-British society had to achieve such a feat proves her containment-and-transmission-fitness for and of Hindu tradition.

    Secret tantric teaching, or tantrism in general, and yoga are outcroppings of Hindu wisdom traditions.  On that note, the western philosophy has ethics and politics—as but two of its own—branches we herein consider—towards contextualisation completion.

    This is not a straightforward line of thought, but we think it manifests as outlined in the following sentence.  Traditional Hindu tantra was geared towards enlightenment and ‘spiritual’ bliss—rather reminiscent of the aims of christianity, pre-colonial Britain’s practiced religion.

    Conversely, our modern western culture has not yet proven itself to be fit—Darwinianlly—or sufficiently qualified to modify five-millenia-old Hindu culture.

    A modern and common-place conception seems to be that: Hindu tantra is about present corporeal-stimulation, rather than reincarnating ‘spiritual’ bliss.  This is why the sexual restraint of Western culture in by-gone-days, seems—somewhat strangely, counter-intuitively—to parallel classical Hindu tantrism’s afterlife considerations.

    Returning to consideration of our source: it explores Hinduism’s diverse philosophical and religious components, which includes the way of action.  This is a discipline—that is ‘spiritual’ or involves the nervous psyche—practiced or pursued by the overwhelming majority of Hindu people. 

    Our use of the term ‘nervous psyche’ is to anchor the argument for materialist reductionalism, rather than a ‘transcendent’ spirituality.  

    It is our intent that publications on our website justify this distinction in detail—although our reasoning was an audiobook borrowing. 

    To continue our relation and commentary on secret tantric tradition, follow this link to the next article.  For a link to a trusted tantra teacher and practitioner, kindly follow this link.

  • SPEARHEAD & SHAFT OR BLADE & HILT?

    The present article—once and for all time—resolves the question of identifying the king of historical martial arts weapons: polearm—spear—or sword.  The—longstanding—debate as to what is the sovereign-weapon shall herein be settled; it is not the spearhead ensemble—but find out why.

    Part 1 of 2 parts

    WEDNESDAY 17TH JUNE 2026 DRAFT NOTICATION

    The present article is a draft*; some of the sources required to provide up-to-date information were not available freely online.  In order to address this incompletion, a number of our researchers state their intent to repair to their respective libraries.

    This is sometimes necessary to gain authorised access to the required documentation for accurate and current information*.

    SETTING THE STAGE & PREFACING THE ABSTRACT

    There are some in the martial arts community who believe the sovereign weapon to be the spear.  The ‘Pleistocene’, 

    According to the Cambridge English dictionary is:

    the period of time between around 1.8 million and 11,000 years ago, in which modern humans first appeared, and the Northern Hemisphere experienced an ice age

    This was mentioned as the earliest period to have produced rudimentary examples of these weapons.  That is to say: approximately—four to two—hundreds of thousands of years[a,b,c] prior to the publication of the present article.

    It should be noted that this spear does not have a shaft that differs from its spearhead regarding material composition.  This is a rather significant observation to recollect later in the present article.

    4 x 105 years ago to 2 x 105 years ago.*

    The references then seem to limit the use of spears to modern humans.  However it may be possible that spears were used earlier, even by non-human species, as they are presently[d].  

    An aside and by way of preface: the age of the universe is some thirteen billion, seven-hundred million years old … Plus or minus two hundred million years.

    13.7 x 109 years … Plus or minus 2 x 108 years 

    Prefacing again, this is: 65.6 million years after the cretaceous mass extinction event—CMEE—to 65.8 million years after CMEE.

    It is more suitable to date the weapon with respect to extinction than cosmogenesis; the smaller timescale is more accurate.  The uncertainty bounds of 2 x 108 years > the age of 4 x 105 years

    The argument favouring the CMEE prehistoric-dating-system is intended for re-publication from its original pre-published articles, in another short-series of articles.

    Returning from our aside, and in continuation of the main topic:

    Others believe the sword to be the sovereign weapon.  The earliest evidence of this tool harks back to three-thousand three-hundred years before the common-era[d,e,f,g,h].

    3,300 BCE

    Prefacing again: this corresponds to 20,371.5 years from the previous terrestrial rotational axis projection closest approach to—TRAPCAT—Polaris’ triple-stellar-system.

    The wobbling—precessing—Earth’s rotational-axis aligns with the aforementioned Polaris-trinary every 25,771.5 times that the Earth orbits its own star—Sol.  Hence the present article’s drafting Gregorian year 2026 CE, corresponds to 25,697.5 years from the previous TRAPCAT Polaris.

    Kindly note that our systems of dating are not official, but preferential.  You could say that we aim to spearhead these ecumenical dating systems for widespread, and ongoing use.  

    I think that is enough punning for one article, don’t you?

    The year—for the present website—begins on the spring equinox on the northern terrestrial hemisphere—from where Polaris can be directly observed.  

    So, for context: the nearly twenty-six millenia cycle happens to end and restart by coincidence in the year 2100 CE.  In other words: that year—shall be, is, was—the dawning of the common era’s twenty-second century within the Gregorian dating system.

    Again, we intend to use our adopted dating systems by way of preface in the present article.  A more formal introduction and justification of them is due in a later short publication series.   

    SPEAR OR SWORD: WHICH IS REALLY SUPREME?

    The answer: sword.

    However, no self-respecting independent thinker would accept the declaration of the previous sentence without suitable justification … This posting’s raison d’etre.  Consider a spear whose spearhead or warhead is of the same continuous material as its shaft—from distal-end to proximal-end.

    Also consider such a spear being able to maintain a cutting edge during its use in battle.  Furthermore, imagine such a weapon additionally being of similar density overall to wood, rather than iron … Such a thing would be king!

    However, such a weapon was not widely reported in history, and other weapons exist now that are superior to both spearhead and blade.

    SAFETY

    From here onwards, the present article is intended to be on the higher brow side of the argument.  This level of snobbery has been corporealised so as to exclude certain individuals.

    The individuals considered are members of the criminal element who are on the opposite-end of the implied and aforementioned spectrum.

    The hope is for knowledge to be more safely transferred to martial arts instructors for their dissemination to students.  Also, students reading this article are encouraged to consult their instructors … Additional safety information shall later be discussed herein.

    It was upon the approach of the winter equinox 25,696.5 TRAPCAT Polaris that the author decided to self-gift.  Christmas was approaching, itself timed for the seasonal change, but these religious festivals hold little sway on the present author.

    As earlier discussed, We are interested in what is true and basically consequential.  Festivals derived from the emergent phenomena of religion borne from the psyche of one animal species have questionable universal significance.

    And yet with that mentioned, in a deterministic universe: all outcomes … Even as trivial and seemingly arbitrary as customs, and trends, could only have occurred in the way that they did. 

    Already owning an arming sword, I decided to purchase a spearhead or warhead.  I settled upon a winged spear, purchased from the Celtic Webstore.

    However, I had other matters on my plate.  As such, I was not able to fit it and train until the spring-equinox of 25,697.5 TRAPCAT Polaris. 

    So in the spring of ‘697.5, I purchased a javelin-head, miniaturised targ, and more spearhead warheads—from the Knights Shop.

    It was only then that I was in a position to fit them onto shafts, fashioning a number of spears.  Fitting, removing, and refitting the spearhead is what began to make me question the claimant’s validity to weapons’ throne.

    FAMILIARITY BREEDING

    You see, in order to remove a spear from its socket requires one type of ergonomic action.  This action would occur when the spearman parries a slashing-blow, or decides to use the spear as a slashing weapon.

    We can use the word ‘spearman’ or ‘spearmen’ in terms of documented historical European martial arts, HEMA, at least.  Most weapon wielders were depicted as adult male homo sapiens sapiens.

    Let us consider the context of the species of the present author and their suspected readers.  Given our afterword-analysis, it is more accurate to somehow replace:

    The letters ‘man’ or ‘men’ with the term ‘sapient sapient’.

    Terminologically: ‘spearman’ could be replaced with ‘sapient sapient spear-wielder’, ‘spear-wielding sapient’, or ‘spear-sapient’ for brevity—yet in the aforementioned homo-sapiens-sapiens context.

    Recall that not all spear-weilders are ‘human beings’ or more accurately: homo sapiens sapiens.

    The derivation of this logic is more sound than ‘woke’; ultimately, it depends upon the conscious use of the weapon.

    The spear at its simplest, is a shaft with a point—which acts as a spearhead for all intents and purposes.  So consciousness, intent, purpose, and the aforementioned sapience is more relevant than the sex or gender of the spear’s wielder.

    We have of course HEMA’s well known ‘one thirty-three’ or ‘i.33’ with Walpurgis.  She is the depiction of a sword-wielding lady in the manuscript from:

    1320 CE, or 

    24,991.5 TRAPCAT Polaris.

    We leave the argument for adopted terminology until the end of the present short series of articles.  Think of that as more of an afterword, … Necessary for us to proceed with the unfolding of ideas, which is the raison d’etre of our website.

    The present website’s hosted articles may be ‘penned’ by different authors, but each one would be considered ‘world-building’ … If the website’s narrative were fictional.

    BACK TO BUSINESS:

    As I was saying: In order to remove a spear from its socket requires one type of ergonomic action.  This action would occur when the sapient spear-wielder parries a slashing-blow—or decides to use the spear as a slashing weapon.

    Fasteners such as nails, screws, or bolts, hold a shaft in the socket of a spearhead.  However, this does not preclude the warhead loosening upon impact.

    The timber of the shaft is typically and comparatively weaker, having a lower yield strength, than steel or even bronze.  As such, the aforementioned fastening nails, screws, or bolts would increase recess or hole volume in the timber.  

    In other words, the holes will get bigger, the fasteners looser—-and the spearhead more likely to detach from the shaft. 

    Click here for Part 2 of 2 parts ….